Is there any evidence or science behind Rashid and his game memorization stuff? It sounds interesting because its different from any other method of study, but I could never find anyone who became a master by his methods. I think he is just outlining the old Russian school of chess improvement though, the " key positions" idea. So if that's the case, then yes, there is extensive evidence to support it. However, to say that he is recommending memorization is far from the truth. Memorizing may be involved, but it's better to think of it like learning a new language, or learning martial arts.
|Published (Last):||7 January 2006|
|PDF File Size:||11.51 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.97 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Very Interesting! I have had the GM-RAM book on my short list for some time and inspired by another source, I decided the other day to try to memorize a few games. The pawn positions shown has all to do with the keysquares on which the king has to stand for the pawn to promote of the king. In your first example the pawn has past the 4th rank so its key squares are just in front of the pawn namely c6-d6-e6, so no matter who is to move the king will always land on such key square for a pawn which has not yet crossed the middle of the board the keysquares are two rows ahead.
So for example for a pawn on e3 the keysquares for the king are d5-e5-f5. If we see at the second example, with black to move white king can not go to a keysquare, Ke8 blocks that while if white to move white can play d7 which leaves only Kc7 for black after which white can play Ke7 and on the next move promote his pawn safely.
Offcourse, all the above goes not up for a the pawns on a- and h-file. Those have their own rules like not letting the black king enter the little box of b7-a7-q-a8-b8 for the a-pawn and g7-g8-h7-h8. I've never understood the lure of that book.
Add a couple of comments on the positions, will it all become worthless with a little more effort from the author? Someone should put out an annotated version of that book :. Blue Devil, The book is more a study system than a collection of positions. As for the positions, the endgame ones are easily found in Averbakh available when the book was written or Dvoretsky which came out more recently. The middlegame positions all stem from the games provided in the text: it is an error to say there are no comments on the positions.
Study the games themselves, and work out whether the best moves were played. That analysis is the training, and the evaluation of the positions. James, I am wondering what you think of GM-Ram, now that you've had it for a few months.
I have the chance to buy a copy but I'd like a few more opinions before taking the plunge. Alastair, I am training daily either with that book or with others via methods inspired partly by GM-RAM and partly by reading in the psychology of learning and excellence provoked by David Shenk's The Genius in All of Us.
It is the most important chess book I have acquired in When it first arrived, I started working through each of its sections: endgames, tactics, the games from which the tactics positions were derived.
After about two months, other elements of my life and work necessitated a reduction in time spent on chess training. In the past week, my chess training time is becoming available again, and the first study I turned to were the first several games Anderssen's in GM-RAM. I just bought the book for 2. I think the study method needed to get any benefit from the book makes the book outstanding.
As GM Nigel Davies said you do not improve by reading chess books and nodding your head. In your first position, white to move draws. If the pawn were one square back, white would win in any case.
Anon, The key line in the first diagram: 1. Ke6 Ke8 2. Nevermind -- that is not the case, of course, when the weaker king is on the back rank. James, this whole business of memorizing games is very intriguing to me. I've always put off memorizing games, because there is actually quite a bit of neuroscience that contradicts any suggestion that building blocks from a few particular games could be widely applicable and helpful.
In neuroscience, it is understood that the process of the mind's abstraction i. Despite this, I've been memorizing some games from Zurich '53, NY '24, and "My Great Predecessors," and I'm shocked to find myself recalling variations of tactics from within those memorized games. It's basically inexplicable within the ambit of all the science I know.
Have you experienced any extraordinary results from memorizing the GM-RAM games, so far as you can tell? I'm planning on memorizing the games in the book. I figure that, if the games are any more essential than the anthologies from which I am currently memorizing, the surely I'll gain much more in the way of benefit.
I am available for one-on-one lessons in person or online. Use the contact form below if interested. Subscribe in a reader. It was out of stock. Ten years later, I searched online through the collections of several used books stores and bought a copy still in pristine condition. The used price was a few dollars more than it had cost new, but the bookstore shipped it the first business day after my order.
It arrived in the mail last Wednesday. Although I found the catalog description appealing, others failed to read it, ordered the book, and then disliked what they received. Contains positions only, no analysis. USCF Catalog, c. The author does not indicate the player on move.
For some positions, one diagram thus becomes two elementary positions. White wins. Black to move draws; White to move wins.
In the middlegame positions, the rationale for excluding the knowledge of who is on move differs. The authors offer a useful explanation at the head of a chapter containing positions and fifty-nine game scores. The first part of the chapter gives the positions. Certain of the games have more than one position included. These positions are like the fingerprint of the games—from this fingerprint, the associated game can be identified.
Following the positions, the full game scores are given. Moreover, in some positions there might be some useful insights gained from an extra tempo. If the position derives from a game where White was on move, but we look at the diagram as if it is Black to move, the result might differ. Such a thought experiment could reinforce the need for vigorous play, for the element of time in chess strategy. The Legendary On the back cover of the book, the publisher offers an extract from the introduction.
In Russian folklore it is said that there are positions which comprise the most important knowledge an aspiring player must acquire. About two-thirds of them are from the endgame and the remaining third are from the middlegame.
Botvinnik-Tartakower, Nottingham is the most recent game in the fifty-nine. Ziyatdinov also offers a more ambitious assessment of the value of complete games from the nineteenth century.
If you know just one of the important classical games, you will be able to become a level player, know 10 games and you will be level, know and you will be Rather, he means learning those games the way we learn the alphabet, and the combinations of sounds that make up the words we use every day without needing to think about them.
Possession of this knowledge renders playing second nature. His includes twelve key king and pawn endgame positions, and claims these are all that are needed to become a strong player. On the other hand, a master must know fifty positions. To be a master you do not need to know thousands of King and Pawn endings. You need to know 50 key positions. The two dozen pawn endgames in GM-RAM: Essential Grandmaster Knowledge include a few that are not among these forty-eight, but perhaps all the essential ideas are in both sets.
Labels: Alburt , endgame , resources for improvement , tactics , Ziyatdinov. Unknown Saturday, 13 February, From the patzer Sunday, 14 February, Blue Devil Knight Friday, 05 March, James Stripes Friday, 05 March, Anonymous Tuesday, 26 October, James Stripes Tuesday, 26 October, Russ Brown Monday, 15 November, Thesaint8x Tuesday, 22 March, Anonymous Tuesday, 06 March, James Stripes Tuesday, 06 March, Unknown Saturday, 05 March, Newer Post Older Post Home.
Subscribe to: Post Comments Atom. Author James Stripes Historian, chess enthusiast, fly angler, educator View my complete profile. Search Chess Skills. Follow by Email. Chess Skills Social Media. Visitors last month. Improve Your Chess. Popular Posts. The finish of this game Logical Chess: A Book Review. Irving Chernev, Logical Chess: Move by Move has earned its place as a classical text that is often recommended to players who seek
GM Ram: Ziyatdinov’s Theory
Thank you for interesting in our services. We are a non-profit group that run this website to share documents. We need your help to maintenance this website. Please help us to share our service with your friends. Share Embed Donate. No part of this work may be reproduced nor transmitted in any form nor by any means, electronic nor mechanical, including photocopying and recording, nor by any information storage nor retrieval system, except as may be expressly permitted by the Copyright Act or in writing from the publisher. Included in these reserved rights are publishing on the Internet or in annotated databases.
Is possible? - beginner adult to Grandmaster
It involves memorising the games and play with all key ideas, moves, combinations and important variations. This knowledge will then help us find the strongest moves and plans in our own games, often suggesting the right path without conscious thought or examination. Lev Psakhis won the Russian Championship 3 times. In Russian folklore it is said that knowledge of positions is required to become a strong master.